America’s top athletes could be banned from the Olympics and other major sports events if the U.S. follows through on its threat to withdraw funding from the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA).
The U.S. threat has sent shockwaves through the anti-doping community and prompted several governments to urge WADA to introduce legislation.
It will be a legislation that will find the U.S. non-compliant with the WADA Code, effectively barring American athletes from international competition.
“The consequences of a withdrawal of WADA funding by the U.S. could be more severe and far-reaching for American athletes,” WADA president Witold Banka told Reuters.
“We have been approached by a number of governments of the world who were shocked by the threats from the U.S. government (and) supported by USADA (United States Anti-Doping Agency).
“These governments want us to consider an amendment to the compliance standard.
”This means that non-payment by a government of its WADA contribution could lead directly to that country’s NADO (National Anti-Doping Organisation) being declared non-compliant with the World Anti-Doping Code.
“Inevitably this could have serious repercussions for athletes from that country, including their participation in major international sports events.”
The Tokyo Olympics have been delayed by a year until July 23 to Aug. 8, 2021 because of the novel coronavirus pandemic.
International Olympic Committee (IOC) rules stipulate there needs to be WADA compliance to allow Games participation.
All Olympic Games’ participants must comply with the IOC Executive Board’s entry process, including the signing of the entry form.
This includes an obligation to comply with the Olympic Charter and World Anti-Doping Code and submit disputes to the Court of Arbitration for Sport’s jurisdiction.
USADA president Travis Tygart fired back by labelling the WADA threat empty and illegal.
“To threaten one country’s athletes over WADA’s failed governance model is pretty remarkable and disappointing,” Tygart told Reuters.
“WADA is very threatened and rattled, but to illegally threaten U.S. athletes is shameful.
“They ought to spend the time trying to fix and make WADA what the world wants it to be, which is a strong independent WADA.
“There’s something wrong when the global regulator attacks one of its key partners that is doing everything to uphold the rules, yet they turn a blind eye to a country like Russia that runs a state-sponsored doping programme.
“The hypocrisy here is incredulous.”
Russian authorities have always denied the existence of state-backed doping in the country.
A report by the White House’s Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP) was highly critical of WADA demanding that it implement immediate reforms.
The report was presented to the U.S. Congress in June and a copy seen by Reuters.
It also suggested that the U.S. withhold funding unless it was given greater representation on WADA boards and committees and “a proportionate voice in decision-making.”
The U.S. is the largest single contributor to WADA, paying over 2.7 million dollars into the 2020 budget of 37.4 million dollars, half of which comes from the IOC.
If the U.S. government was to cut funding it would also lose its spot on the WADA Foundation Board and seats on all committees, WADA says.
“It is surprising WADA would threaten illegal retaliation against the U.S.,” said Tygart. “There is no rule.
“If the U.S. government stops paying the only consequence specified in the WADA rules and UNESCO treaty is that the U.S. could no longer sit on any WADA committees.
“You can trust the federal government looked at the legal ramifications in the event they stopped paying.
“When they realised all it meant was they were off the Foundation board, they went big deal.
“That means nothing to us, it has no power, it is ceremonial.
“There is anti-American bias.”
Even without an amendment to WADA rules, an unprecedented move by the U.S. to cut funding could trigger a messy non-compliance issue and leave American athletes in limbo.
U.S. athletes aiming to qualify for major competitions would have problems.
This is because, even if they were not directly sanctioned by USADA’s compliance status, they could have difficulty demonstrating a clean record.
“It would be very bad,” Jorge Leyva, CEO of the Institute of National Anti-Doping Organisations (iNADO), told Reuters.
“If the U.S. were to pull its share of the funding to WADA then the consequences for USADA — they quite simply would be outside the system and it would be a non-compliance issue working with the Olympic Games and things like that.
“That would simply be a catastrophe for American athletes and the anti-doping system.
“When declared non-compliant, testing gaps are definitely created and then it becomes an arduous logistical challenge to close them.”
WADA has accused USADA of engaging in a risk power play to seize control of sport’s global anti-doping effort, calling the U.S. threat political blackmail.
“This is a critical time for anti-doping, we need unity not division,” said Banka. “I can underline under my leadership I will not let WADA become part of a political game.
“If WADA made past mistakes I can say it, of course, but I will never let WADA be blackmailed and undermine our position as the global regulator.”(Reuters/NAN)